Skip navigation menu
Vote No on 45 - The Corporate Polluting Projects Prop
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Middle Class
    Taxpayers Association: We Can't Afford Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California's Top Land Use Attorneys Agree: Prop 45 Would Speed Data Center Construction
  • PRESS RELEASE

    PPIC Poll Finds Prop 45 Under 50%
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Housing Expert: “Prop 45 Isn't About Affordability or the Housing Crisis."
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Data Center Builder Donates Big to Pass Proposition 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    American Lung Association Urges No on Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Report: Prop 45 Endangers California's Rural Communities
  • PRESS RELEASE

    League of Women Voters California: NO on Prop 45
  • Politico

    Data Center Debate Comes for Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California School Employees Association Urges No on Prop 45, The Corporate Polluting Projects Proposition
  • lassen County Times

    RCRC provides analysis of Prop 45: Recommends voters oppose this proposition
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California Professional Firefighters Urges No on Prop 45, The Corporate Polluting Projects Pollution
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California Federation of Teachers Urges No on Prop 45, The Corporate Polluting Projects Pollution
  • Davis Vanguard

    Proposition 45 Draws Fire Amid Fears of Data Center Environmental Exemptions
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Three Key Facts About Prop 45 The CalChamber Doesn't Want Voters To Know
  • Sacramento bee

    Data centers’ deep political unpopularity enters debate over CEQA reform measure
  • PRESS RELEASE

    BREAKING: New Poll on Prop 45 Says Measure "Faces Significant Headwinds"
  • GreenBelt ALliance

    Chamber-Backed CEQA Initiative Is A Proposition Californians Can’t Afford: No on Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Diverse Coalition Rallies at State Capitol to Oppose Prop 45, the Corporate Polluting Projects Prop
  • NEWS ARTICLE

    Prop. 45 would take state back to bad old daysHeadline Goes Here
  • CalMatters

    California needs to preserve clean air and public oversight. Why Prop. 45 must be stopped
  • Physicians for Social Responsibility Los Angeles

    Protect Public Health in California: Vote No on Prop 45
  • Letter to the Editor: THE Mercury News

    Prop. 45 means to aid developers, business
  • PLanning and Conservation League

    Prop 45 Is a Taxpayer Trap. Every Public Official Needs to Understand Why.
  • Legal Planet: Eric Biber

    BACA and Data Centers, Part I
  • CAlifornia BYCYCLE COALITION

    Why CalBike Opposes Proposition 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Powerful Statewide Coalition Joins Forces to Oppose Ballot Measure That Would Eviscerate California’s Landmark Environmental Law

PRESS RELEASE

California's Top Land Use Attorneys Agree: Prop 45 Would Speed Data Center Construction

SACRAMENTO – In a column in the legal publication The Daily Journal, two of the state’s leading land use attorneys today confirmed that Proposition 45 will fast track the construction of controversial data centers in California. Proposition 45 is the California Chamber of Commerce’s 41-page ballot initiative that would roll back state environmental protections and weaken the state’s defense against President Trump’s attack on state clean air, water, and public health laws.

Richard Frank, Senior Fellow at the California Environmental Law & Policy Center at the UC Davis School of Law, and Matthew McKerley, a land use attorney specializing in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), note “as they did for other projects, the proponents could have expressly excluded data centers in the text of the initiative. They didn’t.”

“The drafters of Prop. 45 explicitly excluded a long list of controversial projects. The measure expressly carves out high-speed rail, the Delta Conveyance Project, nuclear generation, jails, immigration detention facilities, prisons and oil and gas facilities. Data centers are conspicuously absent from this list. Under bedrock principles of statutory interpretation, a California court will read that silence not as an oversight, but rather as deliberate intent to include data centers in Prop. 45’s coverage. As they did for other projects, the proponents could have expressly excluded data centers in the text of the initiative. They didn’t.

"Tellingly, while publicly proclaiming that Prop. 45 has nothing to do with data centers, the Yes Campaign has quietly taken in $2 million from three companies that are actively building them. Prologis, a builder of two San Jose data center campuses, has given $250,000. California Resources Corporation, which is co-developing a 275 MW data center on its Elk Hills oil field, routed $500,000 into a Chamber-controlled committee four days after the measure cleared for circulation, and contributed another $500,000 directly to support Prop. 45 just two weeks ago. And PG&E has given $750,000, a $500,000 direct contribution and $250,000 to the Chamber-controlled committee, while collaborating with a Canadian mega developer to incorporate data centers into three San Jose housing developments.

“Meanwhile, existing environmental law is protecting communities from data centers’ most significant impacts,” they wrote.

The full article can be found here: https://www.dailyjournal.com/articles/394431-prop-45-will-speed-data-center-construction

# # #