Skip navigation menu
Vote No on 45 - The Corporate Polluting Projects Prop
  • PRESS RELEASE

    NO ON PROP 45 CAMPAIGN RELEASES FIRST AD
  • PRESS RELEASE

    LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO SPEED AFFORDABLE AND INFILL HOUSING MAKES PROP 45 UNNECESSARY...
  • POlitico

    Prop 45 Creates a Corporate Loophole to Fast-Track Gas Pipelines, Data Centers and More
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Middle Class
    Taxpayers Association: We Can't Afford Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California's Top Land Use Attorneys Agree: Prop 45 Would Speed Data Center Construction
  • PRESS RELEASE

    PPIC Poll Finds Prop 45 Under 50%
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Housing Expert: “Prop 45 Isn't About Affordability or the Housing Crisis."
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Data Center Builder Donates Big to Pass Proposition 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    American Lung Association Urges No on Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Report: Prop 45 Endangers California's Rural Communities
  • PRESS RELEASE

    League of Women Voters California: NO on Prop 45
  • Politico

    Data Center Debate Comes for Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California School Employees Association Urges No on Prop 45, The Corporate Polluting Projects Proposition
  • lassen County Times

    RCRC provides analysis of Prop 45: Recommends voters oppose this proposition
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California Professional Firefighters Urges No on Prop 45, The Corporate Polluting Projects Pollution
  • PRESS RELEASE

    California Federation of Teachers Urges No on Prop 45, The Corporate Polluting Projects Pollution
  • Davis Vanguard

    Proposition 45 Draws Fire Amid Fears of Data Center Environmental Exemptions
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Three Key Facts About Prop 45 The CalChamber Doesn't Want Voters To Know
  • Sacramento bee

    Data centers’ deep political unpopularity enters debate over CEQA reform measure
  • PRESS RELEASE

    BREAKING: New Poll on Prop 45 Says Measure "Faces Significant Headwinds"
  • GreenBelt ALliance

    Chamber-Backed CEQA Initiative Is A Proposition Californians Can’t Afford: No on Prop 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Diverse Coalition Rallies at State Capitol to Oppose Prop 45, the Corporate Polluting Projects Prop
  • NEWS ARTICLE

    Prop. 45 would take state back to bad old daysHeadline Goes Here
  • CalMatters

    California needs to preserve clean air and public oversight. Why Prop. 45 must be stopped
  • Physicians for Social Responsibility Los Angeles

    Protect Public Health in California: Vote No on Prop 45
  • Letter to the Editor: THE Mercury News

    Prop. 45 means to aid developers, business
  • PLanning and Conservation League

    Prop 45 Is a Taxpayer Trap. Every Public Official Needs to Understand Why.
  • Legal Planet: Eric Biber

    BACA and Data Centers, Part I
  • CAlifornia BYCYCLE COALITION

    Why CalBike Opposes Proposition 45
  • PRESS RELEASE

    Powerful Statewide Coalition Joins Forces to Oppose Ballot Measure That Would Eviscerate California’s Landmark Environmental Law

PRESS RELEASE

LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO SPEED AFFORDABLE AND INFILL HOUSING MAKES PROP 45 UNNECESSARY...

Bills to Speed Timelines, Promote Infill Housing Win Bipartisan Support, Negate Need for “Trump-like Repeal of California’s Environmental Protections”

SACRAMENTO — Three leading California lawmakers today announced their opposition to Proposition 45, saying the ballot measure is an unnecessary overreach in the wake of the passage of multiple bills in this and previous legislative sessions designed to promote affordable housing and responsible infrastructure development. Proposition 45 is the California Chamber of Commerce’s 41-page ballot initiative that would roll back state environmental protections and weaken the state’s defense against President Trump’s attack on state clean air, water, and public health laws.

“Proposition 45 would weaken California’s environmental protections without meaningfully addressing the housing crisis, which the Legislature continues to work on year after year,” said Senator Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas), Chair of the Senate Environmental Quality Committee. “There are other measures on this ballot that will help increase affordable housing. This isn’t one of them. Prop 45 goes too far, has too many loopholes, and would ultimately set us back.”

“Prop 45 is exhibit A of special interests writing the law for themselves, not for the interests of Californians,” said Senator Sasha Renée Pérez (D-Pasadena), member of the Senate Emergency Management Committee. “The legislature has proven we can and will act on this issue. The legislative process is the right way to do reform, not this abuse of the initiative process. Policy by special interests that is nearly impossible to change is always disastrous.”

“Prop 45 is nothing but a hand out to polluters,” said Assemblymember Isaac Bryan (D-Los Angeles), Chair of the Assembly Natural Resources Committee. “It’s not about the housing crisis. It’s not about clean energy. It’s not about affordability. Just follow the money. Data center developers, oil companies, and the major utilities are putting millions into Prop 45 so that they can build more toxic projects, with less accountability, and less community input. We deserve better.”

“Most people don’t quite appreciate how profoundly recent laws changed the game on environmental review for housing,” said Jordan Grimes, Legislative Director at Greenbelt Alliance. “Essentially all urban housing was exempted entirely from CEQA last year, the latest and biggest of dozens of changes to streamline infill and affordable housing. Meanwhile, Prop 45 does nothing to build more of the housing we need. It just puts polluting projects like data centers, freeways, and wildfire-prone sprawl on the fast track.”

Yesterday, the No on Prop 45 campaign launched its first television spot, emphasizing the polluting projects that the measure would fast-track, even as it does nothing for the state’s housing crisis.

These leading legislators join more than 400 organizations including the League of Women Voters of California, American Lung Association, Coalition for Clean Air, California Professional Firefighters, and the California Nurses Association.

The independent Legislative Analyst’s Office concluded the measure will likely cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

# # #